USA National Security Doctrine: Terrorrism between Facts and Neo-Con Fiction

I am still reading the document on the National Security Doctrine. I was wrong when I said that the document does not mention explicitly Islam. The document mentions Islam (page 14, quoted below).

This is a propaganda that might make old communists die from envy.

First: I thought it preposterous that a document on National 'Security' looks in fact like a document on International 'Security'.
Second: I thought it Awkward that Islam was identified as the next international menace after communism in the passage I quoted yesterday (page 4).
Third: With the passage quoted below, it is clear that the doctrine of National 'Security' made in the USA has actually a primary mission alongside Democracy, Free market and so on : Rescuing Islam from itself and rescuing other religions from the danger of Islam.

So the doctrine on National 'Security' not only becomes a doctrine on International 'Security' but also a doctrine of deterrence for an International Religious Energy Agency* based at the white house, USA.

Fourth: The doctrine makes it clear as to the why of its principles. First it states what it is not the cause of the terrorrism it is fighting and then it states what are the causes of the terrorrism it is fighting.
If you compare the two set of causes you realize that everything related to facts on the ground is not considered as a cause for terrorrism while everything stemming from neo-cons ideology, vision and interpretation of the world is considered as a cause for terrorrism.
Logically speaking, What is considered as a cause for terrorrism by the neo-cons and the White house is what is fabricated in their mind, even if it does not have a factual basis.

''While the War on Terror is a battle of ideas, it is not a battle of religions. The transnational terrorists confronting us today exploit the proud religion of Islam to serve a violent political vision: the establishment, by terrorism and subversion, of a totalitarian empire that denies all political and religious freedom. These terrorists distort the idea of jihad into a call for murder against those they regard as apostates or unbelievers – including Christians, Jews, Hindus, other religious traditions, and all Muslims who disagree with them. Indeed, most of the terrorist attacks since September 11 have occurred in Muslim countries – and most of the victims have been Muslims.
To wage this battle of ideas effectively, we must be clear-eyed about what does and does not give rise to terrorism:
• Terrorism is not the inevitable by-product of poverty. Many of the September 11 hijackers were from middle-class backgrounds, and many terrorist leaders, like bin Laden, are from privileged upbringings.
• Terrorism is not simply a result of hostility to U.S. policy in Iraq. The United States was attacked on September 11 and earlier, well before we toppled the Saddam Hussein regime. Moreover, countries that stayed out of the Iraq war have not been spared from terror attack.
• Terrorism is not simply a result of Israeli-Palestinian issues. Al-Qaida plotting for the September 11 attacks began in the 1990s, during an active period in the peace process.
• Terrorism is not simply a response to our efforts to prevent terror attacks. The al- Qaida network targeted the United States long before the United States targeted al- Qaida. Indeed, the terrorists are emboldened more by perceptions of weakness than by demonstrations of resolve. Terrorists lure recruits by telling them that we are decadent and easily intimidated and will retreat if attacked.
The terrorism we confront today springs from:
Or Terrorrism is:
• Political alienation. Transnational terrorists are recruited from people who have no voice in their own government and see no legitimate way to promote change in their own country. Without a stake in the existing order, they are vulnerable to manipulation by those who advocate a perverse vision based on violence and destruction.
• Grievances that can be blamed on others. The failures the terrorists feel and see are blamed on others, and on perceived injustices from the recent or sometimes distant past. The terrorists’ rhetoric keeps wounds associated with this past fresh and raw, a potent motivation for revenge and terror.
• Sub-cultures of conspiracy and misinformation. Terrorists recruit more effectively from populations whose information about the world is contaminated by falsehoods and corrupted by conspiracy theories. The distortions keep alive grievances and filter out facts that would challenge popular prejudices and self-serving propaganda.
• An ideology that justifies murder. Terrorism ultimately depends upon the appeal of an ideology that excuses or even glorifies the deliberate killing of innocents. A proud religion –the religion of Islam – has been twisted and made to serve an evil end, as in other times and places other religions have been similarly abused.''

* As dubbed by Steve Bell, the Guardian cartoonist.